Cálculos auxiliares de problemas|teoremas

Julho 24, 2008

A solution Integral of the Week #2 [Walking Randomly]

Arquivado em: Uncategorized — Américo Tavares @ 9:20 am

I’ve just submitted the following solution for the

« Integral of the Week #2

The second Integral Of The Week (IOTW) is rather different from the first in that I am going to give you the evaluation. Your task is to prove it.

\displaystyle\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}e^{-x^2}\; dx=\sqrt{\pi}

But WAIT! Almost every time I have seen this integral evaluated, it has been done by squaring it and converting to polar co-ordinates and that’s the one method of evaluation you can’t use for this particular challenge. I am looking for more ‘interesting’ proofs. Have fun.

Solutions can be posted in the comments section or sent to me by email (obtaining my email address is another puzzle for you to solve) and will be discussed in a future post. Feel free to send your solution in just about any format you like – plain text, uncompiled Latex, PDF, postscript, Mathematica, ODF, even Microsoft Word. When I get around to posting the solutions I will attempt to standardize them (to PDF probably).

By the way – you still have time to submit a solution for the first IOTW.

=\displaystyle\int_{0}^{\infty }\dfrac{-e^{-\underset{x\rightarrow \infty}{\lim }x}+e^{0}}{2\left( 1+y^{2}\right) }\; dy=\displaystyle\int_{0}^{\infty }\dfrac{1}{2\left( 1+y^{2}\right) }\; dy
=\dfrac{1}{2}\left[ \tan^{-1}y\right] _{y=0}^{\infty }=\dfrac{1}{2}\left( \dfrac{\pi}{2}-0\right) =\dfrac{\pi}{4}.

[updated at 14:41 GMT: two integrals corrected]

[update of July 26, 2008: \square added]

Also posted in my main blog problemas | teoremas

Julho 20, 2008

Sucessão de Eric Rowland

Arquivado em: Uncategorized — Américo Tavares @ 8:30 am

 O seguinte código permite obter no software PARI

 N = 2;
 X = 7;
 while (N <  101,
   Y = X + gcd(N,X);
   if (Y-X > 1,
     print(N &quot: &quot Y-X)
   );
   X = Y;
   N = N + 1
 )

os termos diferentes de um da sucessão que Eric Rowland demonstrou só gerar números primos, além de uns.

Julho 16, 2008

12º ano – Exame 2ª Fase – Questão 2.1 do Grupo II

Arquivado em: Uncategorized — Américo Tavares @ 11:30 pm

Questão 2.1 do Grupo II

2.1 Seja \Omega o espaço de resultados associado a uma experiência aleatória. Sejam A e B dois acontecimentos possíveis (A\subset \Omega e B\subset \Omega ).

Prove que: P(\overline{A}\cup \overline{B})=P(\overline{A})-P(B)+P(A\cup B)

(P designa a probabilidade, $\overline{A}$ o acontecimento contrário de A e \overline{B} o acontecimento contrário de B.)

Resolução 

Como

P(\overline{A\cap B})+P(A\cap B)=1

e

\overline{A\cap B}=\overline{A}\cup \overline{B}

então

P(\overline{A}\cup \overline{B})+P(A\cap B)=1

ou

P(\overline{A}\cup \overline{B})=1-P(A\cap B).

De

P(A\cup B)=P(A)+P(B)-P(A\cap B)

resulta

P(A\cap B)=P(A)+P(B)-P(A\cup B).

Combinando com P(A)+P(\overline{A})=1 vem

P(\overline{A}\cup \overline{B})=1-P(A)-P(B)+P(A\cup B)

P(\overline{A}\cup \overline{B})=P(A)+P(\overline{A})-P(A)-P(B)+P(A\cup B)=P(A)-P(B)+P(A\cup B)

provando assim o que é pedido.

Blog em WordPress.com.